Cumberlege Commission    
Home/StatementsWho's Who?Terms of ReferenceReview ProcessNolan ReportCumberlege Report
Safeguarding with Confidence
 Commission
Who is on the review?
Terms of Reference
Review Process & Information
Available Submissions
 Cumberlege Report
View Report in Full
Download pdf file
Summary Leaflet pdf file
Summary Leaflet Text in Polish pdf file
Press Release
 Nolan Review
Final Report
First Report
 •Executive Summary
 •Ch. 1: Introduction
 •Ch. 2: Safeguarding
 •Ch. 3: Minimising Risk
 •Ch. 4: Responding
 •Ch. 5: Structures
 •Ch. 6: Recommendations
 •Annex 1: Glossary
 •Annex 2: Job Descriptions
 •Annex 3: Diocese
Response to the Review
Recommendations

 First Nolan Report

The structures required to safeguard children from abuse

5.1 Carrying through our recommendations on preventing child abuse and responding to allegations depends critically on the Church being an effective and aware organisation at every level: the parish, the diocese and religious order and nationally. This chapter summarises our proposals in this area.

The parish

5.2 It is in the parish that children are directly involved in church activities: in services, at Sunday school, in youth clubs and so on. Consequently it is here that awareness needs to be at its highest, that policies and prevention strategies need to be clearly understood and that knowledge of what to do when allegations are made needs to be widespread. What is said in the rest of this chapter about arrangements at other levels is designed primarily to support parishes.

5.3 In some dioceses individual lay people in parishes have taken on a special responsibility for child protection matters: ensuring that policies are known and understood, that awareness is raised, and that principles are worked through into everyday practice. This is clearly an important responsibility. We understand that members of the Church have willingly come forward to do this knowing that they will be supported by their parish priest, by the local members of the Church and by wider structures. To our mind, this indicates the desire that there is in many parishes to ensure that the Church is a safe organisation for children. We recommend that every parish priest should appoint a lay child protection representative with these general responsibilities:

to ensure

  • that diocesan policies and procedures are known and followed,
  • that awareness is raised, and
  • that principles are worked through into everyday practice.

The parish child protection representative does not need to be full-time, nor to be a professional or an expert. He/she will be able to draw on such people for support.

The diocese

5.4 As noted earlier, the 1994 Guidelines advised each diocese to identify a representative or "delegate" to "attend to issues of child abuse". In fact these delegates have often taken on a wide range of responsibilities in relation to child protection, and are usually known as Child Protection Co-ordinators. We welcome the fact that each diocese has a diocesan Child Protection Co-ordinator. They will need to be appointed by and directly responsible to the bishop, and to have his full confidence and support as well as that of other senior clergy and lay people. They will be responsible for the effective implementation of policies and practice throughout the diocese, and will be the first line of contact with the statutory agencies (social services and the police) and in particular the statutory Area Child Protection Committees. They will themselves be the first line of support for the parish child protection representatives already recommended.

5.5 The job of the Child Protection Co-ordinator and his/her Team is

(a) ensuring that the diocese has implemented guidelines, based on Safe From Harm, to prevent abuse, and regularly reviews its performance;

(b) being proactive in helping parishes and others in the diocese apply the guidelines - by giving advice on how to apply them and how to make the necessary contacts and checks, by facilitating training and awareness events, and so on; and

(c) overseeing arrangements for responding to allegations and for risk assessment as described in Chapter Four.

5.6 So far these diocesan Co-ordinators have invariably been priests. As we have just said it is most important that they have the full confidence and support of the bishop and parish priests, but we do not consider it essential that they should be priests themselves. It is also important that CPCs have the confidence of victims, the victims' families and friends, the statutory agencies and the wider community.

5.7 The Child Protection Co-ordinator does not need to be professionally qualified, nor does s/he necessarily need to be employed full-time on child protection matters though we believe that in many cases this may be desirable, at least for the present until fully effective arrangements are in place throughout the diocese. What s/he does need is the time, resources, and supporting arrangements (including access to professional support) to do the job properly. We are aware of arrangements in one part of the country where three dioceses have collaborated to fund a child care professional to support them, especially in the area of training and consistency. This seems to work well, and we commend these cross-diocesan arrangements. They may be particularly useful in more rural parts of the country although we think it important that each diocese has its own CPC. We have also been told of a very successful arrangement in one diocese where a CPC is mentored by a child care expert. We believe that CPCs generally would benefit from such an arrangement.

5.8 We do not believe that there is a single blue-print for the structures a diocese should have in place under the Co-ordinator. However, we commend arrangements (based on one diocese) where there is an overarching Child Protection Policy Team having the oversight of further teams focusing on (i) implementation and training, (ii) response to allegations and risk assessment, and (iii) pastoral care. The Child Protection Policy Team is chaired by the Co-ordinator, and includes clerical and lay members of the diocese, social services, police and legal representatives and experts on child abuse. An illustrative chart of these arrangements is at Annex Three.

Religious orders

5.9 Members of religious orders will be subject to the policies and arrangements of dioceses to which they are seconded. Nonetheless, if the whole Church in England and Wales is to have a fully effective approach to child protection, it is essential that religious orders that have contact with children also appoint Child Protection Co-ordinators. These will take on a comparable role to that of the diocesan CPCs in ensuring awareness and appropriate systems and arrangements within their religious orders. There needs to be very close liaison between diocesan and religious order Child Protection Co-ordinators.

A National Child Protection Unit

5.10 There is at present an annual meeting of the diocesan CPCs but no permanent arrangements at national level. We believe that there is a further essential element of support to parishes and to diocesan and religious order Co-ordinators which needs to be put in place. This is a compact national facility, which we call a National Child Protection Unit, that would be able to give them moral support and expert advice, to collect and disseminate good practice, to hold databases of training facilities and other useful information, and to maintain the central confidential database of information that we have recommended in Chapter Three (3.18). The Unit would liaise with the statutory agencies (including the Criminal Records Bureau) at national level, with professional bodies and leading charities in the field and with the other Churches. It would also have a valuable role in collecting data, monitoring that effective arrangements are implemented in dioceses and religious orders, and in seeking to secure improvements where that is not so. It should bring any apparent failure in diocesan or religious order arrangements immediately to the attention of the bishop or religious superior and make an annual report to diocesan bishops and religious superiors on the effectiveness of arrangements in each diocese and order. It should also make an annual report, which we suggest should be published, to the Bishops' Conference on the position overall.

5.11 Amongst early tasks for the Unit should be the preparation and dissemination of good practice on job descriptions and advice on databases and information gathering, including securing appropriate software.

5.12 The right size for the Unit will need to be determined in the light of experience, but we believe that it will need to be headed by a recognised child protection expert and to have a small permanent staff and the resources to maintain databases, procure external advice from time to time, etc. It will need to be properly funded.

5.13 The Unit will itself need strong support from the bishops and religious superiors and we believe that, as with some other central institutions of the Church in England and Wales, one of the bishops should have particular responsibility for it. We also believe that the Unit will benefit if it has a standing advisory (or reference) group with which it can consult and discuss issues, and which will include professionals in the field and representatives of the relevant statutory agencies (social services, police and probation service).

<< Chapter 4

 

 


Catholic Social Network/Online Community